Curing Done-itis

For the past few months, I've been working with small groups of first and second graders, helping them to learn the ancient art of storytelling.

I call it storytelling, and not simply writing, because writing, at least in school, has been reduced all too often into a boring, drill and kill skill. Being able to turn that skill into a story, however, is an art (plus, kids are much more excited to learn "storytelling" than plain old "writing.")

I started with Mensa for Kids' storytelling packet. I turned their introduction article into a video, then played Robert Munch reading his Paper Bag Princess.

The kids were hooked.

We practiced our voices and movements, then learned about the story mountain (and I mentioned they would learn later it's called the "plot diagram.")

Finally, time for the writing. I found "Yolanda the Yarnspinner" in the Primary Education Thinking Skills books. She talks of using "colorful language" to tell a good story, encouraging kids to use words like "billowing" and "sparkles."

I turned them loose with sentence starters: "The baby cried" and "The dog barked."  

Then came what I had been afraid of.

"I'm done!" one munchkin announced, about 5 minutes into her writing. "Me, too!" another exclaimed.

I had to act fast.

"Oh, my friends," I announced in a dramatic voice. "I think you have that disease. That terrible disease."

I shook my head.

"What disease?" one asked, completely hooked.

"Done-itis," I pronounced. "You think you can rush and rush and yell 'I'm done!'"

I hammed it up. "I'm done! I'm done!" I yelled in silly voices.

They giggled.

"Do you think Robert Munch -- the guy who wrote the Paper Bag Princess -- rushed through his story and yelled 'I'm done!'"

"Noooooo," they chorused.

"Nope," I agreed. "Or do you think he wrote, and he thought about it, then wrote some more, then thought some more, then wrote again -- and finally, finally, after lots and lots of work, he leaned back, smiled and nodded, and announced, 'Yes, I am done.'"

They nodded. Yup, that's exactly what he must have done, they concluded.

"So, my friends," I asked. "Are you really done? Or do you still have more thinking to do?"

They smiled and turned back to their writing, and for another ten minutes (an eternity in a 6-year-old's world), my room was silent as eight little hands put pencil to paper. I got stories of alien mothers and snowman babies, robbers and werewolves.  Stories they were proud of. Stories they were excited to share. Stories that they knew they had put some hard thought into -- and stories that, when they were done, were really, truly done.

Negotiating a Win/Win in Class

I’ve been pondering the idea of win/win situations lately, and their application in the classroom. In my work, I hear a lot from teachers frustrated with their GT students who are refusing to perform assignments to their high ability. This ranges from reading logs to projects to daily classwork to homework – it’s not getting done, and the teacher is at the end of her rope with explaining, cajoling, calling parents, giving “working lunches” – nothing is working.

And I’m beginning to think, “Well, yeah – you’ve created, at best, a win/lose relationship.” But, how can I spread this message with diplomacy, without making it seem like an attack on a teacher but an observation of the situation from somebody who sees both sides?

Covey’s relationships, from his 7 Habits series:

Win/win – everybody comes away with the feeling that their opinion has been valued, and their needs are being met.

Win/lose – one person comes away with their needs being met; the other person is doing all the “giving” in the relationship.

Lose/lose – neither party is satisfied with the outcome of this situation.

To examine these relationships in a typical classroom setting:

Student X never finishes classroom assignments (let alone projects or homework!). If he does finish something, he will usually be the last one done. However, what has been finished shows high mastery of skill.

A lose/lose outcome: X’s teacher insists on him doing the same work as everybody else, regardless of mastery shown. It’s only fair – if the rest of the class has to do 15 problems, then so does X. His folder is full of messages to his parents about incomplete assignments, and his grades are terrible. He has shut down emotionally in class, to the point where even the bare minimum is not being met. X’s teacher is frustrated – she can’t get him to do anything. X is frustrated – school is not meeting his needs at all, and he’d really rather not be there.

A win/lose outcome: X’s teacher insists on him doing the same work as everybody else, regardless of mastery shown. It’s only fair – if the rest of the class has to do 15 problems, then so does X. If he doesn’t get it done in class, then he is made to work during lunch or other “down” time in the day. X complies, and the work is “completed.” The quality, however, is fairly poor, and does not show his true capability. The teacher has “won” – her needs are being met (mostly) with his completed assignments and compliance. X, however, has gained little from this interaction other than an understanding of “how to play the (school) game.”

A win/win outcome: X’s teacher determines her non-negotiables for an assignment. It must be high quality; it must show mastery of the work. However, she allows room for negotiation. Instead of completing the entire worksheet, perhaps X can get a “quality discount.” If, say, he can choose which 6 problems to complete, and completes them without error, then he doesn’t have to finish the rest of the assignment, and is graded on what he has done.  But that’s not fair! Everybody else has to complete the assignment! Well, then why not offer this to everybody in the class? If the majority are showing mastery of a subject after only completing half of the practice…then perhaps they are all ready to move on, and insisting on finishing a page for the sake of finishing it is a waste of the teacher’s time as well as the students’. The teacher gets what she needs – an assessment of what the student is capable of doing. And X gets what he needs – some choice over how his time will be used.

It seems, as we get further into the school year and the stresses of planning, grading, state assessments and the like begin to mount, the willingness to negotiate with students becomes less and less. What students need – and GT students need in particular – is some choice and control over what they do and how they do it. I don’t mean letting a student get away with not working at all – that is still a win/lose relationship, although the student in that case is the victor, and the teacher the losing party. 

But please, as you plan, identify areas where student choice can be implemented. If you find yourself in a win/lose or lose/lose relationship, consider stepping back and talking to your student.

“What is it about this assignment that keeps you from completing it? This is why I gave you the assignment, and what I need you to show me through it. How can we rework this so we both feel as if we’re getting what we need from it?”

With a little bit of flexibility, you may just save yourself – and your students – a lot of frustration and wasted time.

Begin with the End in Mind

Those of you who know Stephen Covey's 7 Habits of Highly Effective People know that my title today comes from his second habit. I work on a "Leader in Me" campus, where we take his habits and try to instill them in kids. I know, I know, it sounds like another of those "follow me and I'll show you the way, for only 90 bajillion dollars"types of character programs -- except that it's working. Really well. And the best part is that it's not only character education for kids -- it's working on the grownups, too. In fact, this blog exists because of my personal Wildly Important Goal. (Yes, I speak fluent Edubabble -- stay tuned for more!)

This summer, I also attended a four-day seminar by David Langford, who has researched and shared dozens upon dozens of tools intended to help kids problem-solve and become more intrinsically motivated. Although I had some serious issues with some of his ideas, I really liked his thoughts on having kids determine what an end product will be.  Also, he is a huge fan of sticky notes, and I like sticky notes, too. (Especially when I can color-code them. Hush. It's a teacher thing.)


With the start of my GT pullout classes last week, I wanted to "Begin with the End in Mind" and set the tone for the year. So I took that "quality" idea, reached into my bag of tricks and mixed this together:

For those of you "in the know," you may recognize the Thinking Map in the photo above. I'll spare you the testimonial, but I really like these tools, too. I talked to my students (grades first through fifth) about what quality means, then they brainstormed on their sticky notes how they know they've completed quality projects. They then had to group their sticky notes close to others with similar messages. (My favorite up there came from a first grader: "I wark my but oof.")

I put together the bulletin board with titles after everybody had the opportunity to define quality. Now, it's a visual reminder in my room that we all know quality when we see it -- and, we know how to create it.